Developing Story
DOJ Position on SEP/RAND Antitrust Claims
The DOJ filed a statement of interest in Samsung v. Netlist asserting that SEP status does not create a presumption of antitrust market power, continuing its pattern of intervention in SEP/RAND disputes. This position narrows the antitrust counterclaim pathway for standard implementers while supporting SEP holders. The case and DOJ policy have broad implications for technology licensing strategy.
Importance: 80%Confidence: 87%Mentions: 1Updated: April 9, 2026
## DOJ Position on SEP/RAND Antitrust Claims
### Overview
The US Department of Justice has filed a statement of interest (SOI) in the Samsung v. Netlist patent litigation reinforcing its position that inclusion of a patent in a technical standard does not create a presumption of market power for antitrust purposes. This filing continues a pattern of DOJ intervention in SEP/RAND disputes.
### The Samsung–Netlist Dispute
- **Netlist**: Memory systems developer asserting standard essential patents (SEPs)
- **Samsung**: Consumer electronics giant; filed antitrust counterclaims alleging SEP abuse and false RAND (reasonable and non-discriminatory) licensing promises
- **DOJ SOI**: Filed in April 2026, asking the court to reject antitrust liability based solely on standard inclusion
### DOJ's Core Legal Position
1. **No market power presumption**: SEP status alone does not establish the market power element required for antitrust claims.
2. **Consistent with prior interventions**: DOJ has filed similar SOIs in other SEP/RAND litigation — this is a deliberate, repeated policy stance.
3. **Pro-innovation framing**: DOJ appears concerned that expansive SEP antitrust liability could deter standard-setting participation.
### Strategic Implications
#### For SEP Holders
- DOJ position provides support for resisting antitrust counterclaims in licensing disputes.
- Standard participation remains legally safer with DOJ backing on market power question.
#### For Implementers / Licensees
- Antitrust counterclaims against SEP holders face higher bar with DOJ opposition.
- RAND breach claims in contract remain viable; antitrust route is narrowed.
#### For Standard-Setting Organizations
- DOJ's position reinforces SSO participation without per se antitrust exposure.
### Watch
- Court ruling on Samsung's antitrust counterclaims
- Whether DOJ files additional SEPs in other pending cases
- FTC posture alignment or divergence with DOJ
- ITC proceedings involving SEPs