A Better Newspaper

## Overview Hong Kong's top court has formally recognized harassment as a tort under common law, in the case *Sir Elly Kadoorie & Sons Limited v Samantha Jane Bradley [2026] HKCFA 2* (SCMP, April 8). ## Key Facts - The Court of Final Appeal ruling represents the culmination of a legal development that had been debated in Hong Kong's lower courts for over a decade (SCMP, April 8). - The case establishes that persistent "annoying" conduct can legally constitute harassment actionable in tort, not merely a nuisance (SCMP, April 8). - The recognition follows earlier High Court engagement with the issue, described as "more than a decade in the making" (SCMP, April 8). ## Why It Matters This is a significant common law development for Hong Kong's legal system: - It creates a new civil cause of action, expanding plaintiffs' ability to sue for harassment without needing to rely on criminal harassment statutes or other torts (e.g., nuisance, defamation). - It has implications for employment law, landlord-tenant disputes, family/personal disputes, and corporate governance (given the case involves the prominent Kadoorie family business). - As a Court of Final Appeal precedent, it will bind lower courts and likely spur a wave of new harassment tort claims in Hong Kong, comparable to similar developments in other common law jurisdictions (e.g., UK, Canada). ## Entities Involved - Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal - Sir Elly Kadoorie & Sons Limited - Samantha Jane Bradley ## Outlook Expect this precedent to be cited in future Hong Kong litigation and potentially influence policy discussions on harassment protections; relevant to employment law practitioners and corporate risk assessments in Hong Kong.