A Better Newspaper

The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to limit the power of lower federal courts, part of a broader pattern of seeking to curtail judicial checks on executive action (SCOTUSblog, October 19). This development follows the administration's extensive use of the Supreme Court's emergency ('shadow') docket, where its record of wins and losses has been mixed depending on the issue area (SCOTUSblog, October 19). The request to limit lower courts' power represents an escalation of the administration's broader legal strategy to reduce judicial constraints on presidential authority, including in areas like agency removal power (e.g., NLRB) and nationwide injunctions. ## Background Throughout the Trump administration's second term, it has frequently turned to the Supreme Court's emergency docket to overturn adverse lower-court rulings, with varying degrees of success (SCOTUSblog, October 19). The latest filing asks the Court to formally constrain lower courts' authority, which could have sweeping implications for how federal judges can check executive actions going forward (SCOTUSblog, October 19). ## Why It Matters For attorneys and litigants challenging federal executive action, a ruling constraining lower-court power could fundamentally alter litigation strategy, forum selection, and the availability of injunctive relief nationwide. This is a developing legal story with significant implications for separation-of-powers doctrine and the practical ability of plaintiffs to obtain relief against federal government action.